The impact of globalization has an incisive impact of security at the
individual, state, regional, and systematic levels, and that impact does not
always produce a climate of harmony or collective agreement. In most occasions
since the end of War World II and the establishment of the UN Security Council
veto, especially after the demise of the Soviet Union and the eastward expansion
of capital globalization, the most powerful of the industrialized states in the
Security Council have generally been on the same page when it comes to so-called
security issues, which usually holds global economic benefits for states and the
private sector, that require military intervention. The case with the civil war
in Syria has not been so cut and dry, and economic and political interests have
been split within the permanent members of the UN Security Council in a way that
has been reminiscent of the last years of the League of Nations.
Individual level:
As in any similar scenario, a civil war is a serious threat to the citizens
of a state, and in the case of the Syrian Civil War “more than 115,000 people
have been killed in Syria's two-and-a-half-year-old civil war, including tens of
thousands of soldiers, rebels and civilians” has been reported by the Syrian
Observatory for Human Rights [1]. This situation is greatly aggravated when
foreign industrialized states, permanent members of the UN Security Council, and
the private sector corporations within their borders, are arming different sides
of the domestic civil conflict. One recent example was apparent when “Russia’s
state arms exporter Rosoboronexport (ROE)” lost a deal with the U.S. after it
“was revealed that the company was still supplying arms to Syria”[2]. On the
other side of the spectrum, the U.S. has been arming Syrian opposition groups in
order to weaken the Assad regime. According to a September 2013 report by the
Washington Post, “the CIA has begun delivering weapons to rebels in Syria,
ending months of delay in lethal aid that had been promised by the Obama
administration [3].
State level:
The civil conflict in the Syrian state, intensified if not perpetuated by
foreign industrialized states with economic and political interests in
establishing a new regime or maintaining the current regime in the region, has
caused physical and economic destruction to the state. Before the Syrian war
“unemployment was below 10 percent; now every second Syrian is without a job”
and “overall economic costs of the war already surpass the [country's] annual
economic output”, not to mention economic investment in Syria has plummeted [4].
Of course, regardless of which regime controls Syria after the conflict dies,
the IMF and World Bank will be prepared to issue the victorious regime so-called
humanitarian loans in order to open the Syrian state to foreign private sector
investment (exploitation).
Systematic level:
The United Nations Security Council works well enough when the economic and
political interests of the Permanent members of the UN Security Council are on
the same page (or in a majority), but reminiscent of the League of Nations, it
does not provide international security when the member states are at odds
concerning economic and political interests.
1. Reuters, “Syria Death Toll Tops 115,000, Group Says,” Huffington Post,
October 1, 2013, accessed November 17, 2013,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/01/syria-death-toll_n_4022414.html
2. Christopher Haress, “Russian Arms Deals: US Scraps Plan To Buy 15 Russian
Helicopters Amid Syrian Disagreement,” International Business Times, November
15, 2013, accessed on November 17, 2013,
http://www.ibtimes.com/russian-arms-deals-us-scraps-plan-buy-15-russian-helicopters-amid-syrian-disagreement-1472372
3. Ernesto Londono & Greg Miller, “U.S. Weapons Reaching Syrian Rebels,”
Washington Post, September 11, 2013, accessed on November 17, 2013,
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-09-11/world/41972742_1_lethal-aid-syrian-rebels-chemical-weapons
4. Hilke Fischer, “Civil War Shatters Syrian Economy,” DW, October 31, 2013,
accessed November 17, 2013,
http://www.dw.de/civil-war-shatters-syrian-economy/a-17196882
No comments:
Post a Comment